Communication hasn't taken place. The ongoing persistence of conditions only explainable by the absence of communication can only be meaningfully addressed at the emergent new level of 'the internet' - that is, a historically new technological means by which we must necessarily formally establish a new norm that's fit to the requisite specificity unavoidable in the formalization of technological design itself.

in other words 'technology isn't neutral' & the process which goes into creating a technology of any particular structure is unavoidably influenced by the human conversation which proceeds distinguishing what even comes into play in the process… all of this is to say that 'technology is a function of culture' - and the without accounting for this, we're inevitably lost within a reality we've unknowingly created & taking actions unable to take this into account. In order for responsibility to even be possible, then - a revolution in consciousness must be confronted:

“Until you make the unconscious conscious, it will direct your life and you will call it fate.” ―C.G. Jung

The formalization (creating a sustaining/generative background) of this process thus corresponds with 'technology is a function of culture' by proposing a 'technology of cultural navigation' - such that humanity (self critically) participates in a conversation (communicates with each other) discerning how designs in technology facilitate (are in service 0f) the realization of the conversation itself. That the human values/needs present in our contact with each other (the conversation) can be the source of what the design (strategy) is in service of…

[The distinction between strategy and need.]

A principle at the heart of the history of political philosophy - Magna Carta, Declaration of Independence, etc…