Source 0083 — Moving Documents Interesting Scenario

Source decision 0083 — Moving Documents Interesting Scenario


    Original source · exact version bafyreihbo4325sjbk5zuxlkbqqukfuv4wahntc2a4ebsgojt4bh2n2ggye · Read-derived block

    Classification: skip; source kind: reference-only; decision: reject; confidence: high; review status: needs-review.

    Rationale: Implementation-time scenario/question with no answer or chosen policy; retain as a decision reference supporting Move, not an accepted user story or success evidence.

    Review qualification: Uncertain identity/behavior/duplication remains a separate candidate; do not merge without review.

Evidence snapshot: original readable text and block backlinks

    Paragraph While implementing the new Move Dialog UX, I got an interesting clarifying question from my Coding Agent: source block

    Paragraph For Move, if the user has multiple accounts/capabilities, should the workflow require one currently selected signing account to have write permission on both the source document and target parent, or can the app combine permissions from different accounts? source block

    Paragraph The Context is the next: source block

    Paragraph the desktop app can hold multiple accounts source block

    Paragraph "Account A" have writing capabilities in "Site A" source block

    Paragraph "Account B" have writing capabilities in "Site B" source block

    Paragraph I want to move "Doc A" from "Site A" to "Site B" source block

    Paragraph Because the system knows the current user have Write access to Both Sites but with different accounts, should we let the user do this? or should we Limit moves to Accounts that have Writing capabilities to both the source and the target paths? source block

Do you like what you are reading? Subscribe to receive updates.

Unsubscribe anytime

Attributes
name
Source 0083 — Moving Documents Interesting Scenario
owner
status
needs-review
sources
1.
reviewStatusneeds-review
sourceBlockIdw6lI9S2X
sourceVersionbafyreihbo4325sjbk5zuxlkbqqukfuv4wahntc2a4ebsgojt4bh2n2ggye
sourceDocument
extractionRationaleImplementation-time scenario/question with no answer or chosen policy; retain as a decision reference supporting Move, not an accepted user story or success evidence.
reviewer
confidence
high
provenance
1.
reviewStatusneeds-review
sourceBlockIdw6lI9S2X
sourceVersionbafyreihbo4325sjbk5zuxlkbqqukfuv4wahntc2a4ebsgojt4bh2n2ggye
sourceDocument
extractionRationaleImplementation-time scenario/question with no answer or chosen policy; retain as a decision reference supporting Move, not an accepted user story or success evidence.
candidateType
skip
reviewDecision
reject
reviewRationale
Horacio-authorized source-faithful migration decision. Near matches deliberately remain separate pending reviewer reconciliation.
duplicateCandidates

Empty list

classificationRationale
Implementation-time scenario/question with no answer or chosen policy; retain as a decision reference supporting Move, not an accepted user story or success evidence.
Attributes schemaThe fields this document carries.
Fetching schema…